Wednesday, June 6, 2012


"Bottom-line mentality" has become and remained the root cause of modern U.S. society's apathy for well too long, which greatly lack both in philanthropy and happiness.

Is it based in greed, narcissism, or selfish expanse that leads to the 1 % considering that it is only they who are capable to distribute monies accordingly....?  What a bad joke, obviously, one that folks are fed up with to say the very least.

ALL WORKING ESTABLISHMENTS in the land of the not-so-free (U.S.A.) would suit an authentic democracy by being structured so to reflect the proportionate gains of a company throughout its entire work force.

Those who are helping the business to thrive (not merely upper management fermenting-sacks either) need be rewarded and shared with appropriately.

  Once individuals within a community prosper, as does their own community, allowing them to become better participates of the democratic process.

  I suggest this be a true profit sharing structure, stating clearly that the CFO must cut bonus checks to all employees post-periods of financial growth, quarterly profits, and quality sales.

 The amount paid need be based upon an agreeable percentage that helps all to gain and prosper, not just a few prats...like is the commonplace case of today.

Why would this stance be called of a wrongful thinking by anyone in their right mind, who desires to promote well-being and the greater creativity of a sense towards one's positive contribution?

It would seem clear to me that the 1% has become saturated in false aspirations depicted by war pigs, banking thugs, and prime ministers desiring to be a king of austerity while fortifying the walls of inequality.

Observed by
j.a. knolls