Wednesday, January 27, 2010
three immortals' platform
Sunday, January 24, 2010
hoe your eyes
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
hermes trismegistus
From his writings in The Emerald Tablet
"True, without falsehood, certain and most true, that which is above is the same as that which is below, and that which is below is the same as that which is above, for the performance of miracles of the One Thing. And as all things are from the One, by the meditation of One, so all things have their birth from this One Thing by adaptation. The Sun is its Father, the Moon its Mother, the Wind carries it in its belly, its nurse is the Earth. This is the Father of all perfection, or consummation of the whole world. Its power is integrating, if it be turned into earth.
You shall separate the earth from the fire, the subtle from the gross, suavely, and with great ingenuity and skill. Your skillful work ascends from earth to heaven and descends to earth again, and receives the power of the superiors and of the inferiors. So thou hast the glory of the whole world--therefore let all obscurity flee from thee. This is the strong force of all forces, overcoming every subtle and penetrating every solid thing. So the world was created. Hence all were wonderful adaptations, of which this is the manner. Therefore I am called Hermes Trismegistus having the three parts of the philosophy of the whole world. What I have to tell is completed concerning the Operation of the Sun."
Monday, January 11, 2010
jade mountain (formosa island)
Saturday, January 9, 2010
number 9 : tao te ching
9
Fill your bowl to the brimand it will spill.
Keep sharpening your knife
and it will blunt.
Chase after money and security
and your heart will never unclench.
Care about people's approval
and you will be their prisoner.
Do your work, then step back.
The only path to serenity.
nguyen van nghi, md.
Born January 2nd, 1909 in Hanoi, Vietnam, Nguyen Van Nghi was educated in Vietnam, China and France. Completing his medical degree from the University of Marseilles, he began a combined Eastern and Western medical practice in 1940.
In 1954 he devoted his practice entirely to acupuncture based on the classical texts: Huang Di Nei Jing (Suwen, Lingshu) and the Nan Jing. He died December 17th, 1999, in the town of his residence, Marseilles, France.
Some of his many titles and affiliations included: Technical Director of the National Institute of Acupuncture, France; Honorary President of the International Society of Biological Medicine; Director of Chinese Medicine, Lausanne and President of the World Association of Acupuncture.
His publications include: Traite de Médecine Chinoise; Pathogenie et Pathologie énergétique en Médecine Chinoise; Human Energetics (L'énergétique humaine); Théorie et practique de l'analgésie par acupuncteur; Complete translations of texts of Tang Dynasty origin: Huangdi Neijing (Suwen three volumes at 1500 pages, and Lingshu, three volumes at 1500 pages); Nan Jing, three volumes; Zhenjiu Da Jing, three volumes; the Shanghan Lun; the Mai Jing; Sémiologie et thérapeutique en médecine énergétique oriental and Pharmacologie en médecine oriental.
Some background from the perspective of Sean Christiaan Marshall, D. Ac
Nguyen Van Nghi was first invited to this country in 1972, during the acupuncture craze that followed Nixon's discovery of China. It would be 16 years before he returned...
It seems now in, 2002, that I knew Van Nghi long before we actually met. In early 1976, I had founded Jung Tao School, teaching primarily taijiquan and practicing and teaching what acupuncture I had learned through taiji studies. In order to gain more formal training, I enrolled at Occidental Institute of Chinese Studies of Toronto, Canada. In 1976, there were two schools in North America: NESA and OICS. At that time, OICS was a mixture of residential, seminar and correspondence training. Although no one may have known at the time, the president and director of OICS, Walter D. Sturm, is to be applauded. He is to be applauded for sparing me, and many others, from much erroneous and superfluous information about acupuncture. But he is to be applauded even more so because the French speaking Canadian members of the staff created an access to the works of Nguyen Van Nghi, that had been available (en française) since 1966, thus making it the core of the OICS curriculum. As a result, our exposure to Chinese medical theory, from the outset, was based on Van Nghi's synthesis of the classical texts. No one knew that then, but what a blessing. It was clear to me this material had impeccable authenticity. I consumed whatever I could find that traced its origins to Van Nghi.
By 1979, and having graduated from OICS, Dr. Sturm and I had become friends. Because of my previous experience, I was offered a position as vice president in charge of clinical development at the OICS resident training facilities and Alumi offices in Miami. It was a womderful opportunity and I also saw it as a means to get closer to Van Nghi's teachings, and it was. Importantly, was work on English language transcripts of lectures on the energetics of gynecology by Jean-claud Darras, a long time student of Van Nghi. I also learned more of Van Nghi, the man, his history; his struggles, his life-long devotion to the field of Chinese medicine and his immense skill as a physician and scientist.
But in any case, for the time being, I assumed that this mysterious; French speaking; Vietnamese doctor, Nguyen Van Nghi, was sort of like a Lao Zi figure: part myth, part legend (maybe all myth and legend) but clearly no one, the likes of me especially, would ever raise a glass with. It was clear though, by virture of his teachings, that he was someone to whom all should pay heed. So I paid heed. I paid heed, but I had no idea of the depth to which this man understood what he was saying, writing and teaching. The more of his stuff I found, the more I realized how vast this field was and how little I knew. I plodded onward.
In 1987 when I heard that he was going to be in this country, presenting a seminar, that I could actually attend....
As I sit here now in my office, writing this and working on the final draft of the English language translation of the Ling Shu, one of Van Nghi's final instructions to me, I look back at those years. What a legacy. I know, that what this man has done, will not be understood for some time to come. But it will be. It will be understood that he has saved true classical Chinese medicine from extinction. But this will not happen automatically. In San Francisco this spring, Tran cautioned me: he said this work will not be completed by our generation, it is too vast, too deep. We must count on the new young people coming into the field now, to carry this forward. And so we must.
Van Nghi was a genius, who had an understanding of the world and the cosmos far greater than the scope of Chinese medicine. He understood the world at the level Einstein understood it. He understood it at the level Lao Zi understood it. I hope that those who knew him will remember, and that those who didn't will find: Van Nghi was always a source of good will and good cheer, of freely sharing his knowledge, of insisting on cooperation and community, of unification of East and West and the creation of One Medicine that belongs to all.
And so it comes to this. It is our task now, and the task of the coming generations, to continue this work, to honor his travail, and to honor this man: Nguyen Van Nghi, MD.
Van Nghi, age 64, at the International Symposium on Acupuncture, St. Petersburg, Florida, USA, 1973
chief two trees, a cherokee healer
CITIZEN-TIMES CORRESPONDENT
published: April 26, 2005 6:00 am
Thanks to Bea Woodward for passing this on!
Friday, January 8, 2010
13.0.0.0.0
"our connection to the cosmos is an inductive one...
Thursday, January 7, 2010
Wednesday, January 6, 2010
Sunday, January 3, 2010
the art of medicine's view of our diabetes epidemic
“So Sweet was ne’er so fatal.” Shakespeare’s Othello
Diabetes is so common in America and other western countries that its presence in any human group has become a marker for civilization. Ironically, in no other field of western medicine has the promise of scientific breakthrough failed so poignantly as in that of diabetes.
Diabetes is characterized by abnormally high levels of sugar or glucose in the blood, which spills into the urine, causing it to be sweet. The disease was first described by the Greeks who called it diabetes mellitus or “honey passing through.” Today there are at least 20 million diabetics in America, six million of whom must take shots of insulin daily. Scientists hailed the discovery of insulin in the 1920s as one of medicine’s greatest achievements—as, in fact, it was. Insulin is a pancreatic hormone needed for the transfer of glucose from the blood to the cells. When this system fails—when the pancreas does not produce enough insulin or the insulin cannot get the glucose into the cells—then the sugar level in the blood remains abnormally high. This is the disease we call diabetes.
Originally, doctors thought that diabetes was simply a disease of insulin deficiency, a disease in which pancreas was unable to produce enough insulin to meet the body’s demands, and that it could be successfully managed once the right knowledge and technology were in place. Over time, researchers have produced better delivery systems for insulin, and ways to produce more purified and effective types of insulin—from porcine insulin to human insulin produced through genetic engineering. The medical profession has learned that giving insulin orally was unsuccessful, that subcutaneous injections were better, and that delivering it through a pump was best. Yet with all the improvements that have been made since 1920, diabetes remains one of the leading causes of death and disability in the western world. Complications of diabetes include heart disease and circulation problems, kidney disease, degeneration of the retina leading to blindness, neuropathy resulting in numbness, tingling, pain and burning in the extremities, foot ulcers to gangrene and high risk of infection.
Today, doctors realize that diabetes is a much more complicated condition than one of the simple insulin deficiency. They have also discovered that there are two types of diabetes. Type I diabetes, which is called insulin-dependent or childhood diabetes, usually develops before age of 30, and involves a malfunction of the pancreas. Type I diabetes is thought of as an autoimmune disease in which some trigger causes the body’s immune system to attack its own insulin-producing cells (called the islets of Langerhans) in the pancreas. In time, the pancreas loses its ability to produce insulin, blood sugar rises, and serious adverse consequences, including death, can occur if the person is not supplied with insulin. As yet, there is no consensus as to what the autoimmune trigger for Type I diabetes might be. Some evidence points to the early feeding of pasteurized cow’s milk, soy products and grains, or the use of vaccines, as likely triggers. Type I diabetes is often very difficult to control and, if not successfully controlled, can lead to the early onset of many of the complications listed above.
Type II diabetes, which is much more common than Type I diabetes, has a different etiology. It is the form of diabetes that is literally crying out for the new perspective from the one currently offered by the medical profession.
In order to understand the diabetes epidemic in the western world, and why the conventional treatment for this scourge has made almost no dent in its long-term impact on those who suffer from it, we must understand some basic biochemistry. The control of the blood sugar is one of the most fundamental requirements for a healthy life. Blood sugar levels can become abnormal in one of two ways: they can become too low, which we define as a blood sugar less than 80 and call hypoglycemia; or they can become too high, defined as a blood sugar over 110, which is called hyperglycemia. While neither hypoglycemia, nor hyperglycemia is good for your health, they appear to call forth very different reactions in the human being. For example, if your blood sugar drops below 40, you will become disoriented, confused, and if the situation persists, slip into a coma and die. This situation is a true medical emergency. When blood sugar is between 40-60, you feel shaky, jittery, anxious, sweaty, confused and irritable. When blood sugar is between 60-80 these same symptoms occur, but they are less severe.
The body reacts to the emergency situation of low blood sugar in the many ways. When blood sugar even begins to drop below 80, the body produces a number of hormones, principally adrenaline and glucagon. The main effect of adrenaline is to make more sugar available to the cells. It is the production of adrenaline that accounts for the familiar shaky, jittery feeling that many have experienced during these hypoglycemic episodes. Glucagon helps raise blood sugar levels by increasing fat breakdown and stimulates the conversion of fat into sugar.
There may be as many as 10 or more hormonal or biochemical reactions that occur during the early stages of hypoglycemia. One is the release of growth hormone, which has also been found to increase blood sugar in times of stress. As you can see, the body is well prepared to ward off this potential emergency. It has multiple overlapping mechanisms to prevent a precipitous fall in blood sugar, and many of these reactions produce clear symptoms that provoke us into action. Severe hypoglycemia is clearly a situation our adaptive physiology has learned to avoid.
The situation is much different in respect to hyperglycemia. Many times during my practice I have asked a new diabetic patient how they felt and heard them reply, “a little tired, but not bad.” Yet routine screening blood tests tell me that some of the unsuspecting patients have blood sugar levels as high as 400, almost 4 times the normal level. These people are at strong risk for all the major complications of diabetes including coronary artery disease and neurological disease, yet they feel nothing, their bodies give them little warning. Why is this?
Some have conjectured that the body has a hard time dealing with hyperglycemia because the conditions that cause it—namely overeating—are a relatively new phenomenon in human history. On the other hand, hypoglycemia induced by lack of food has been a frequent occurrence to which the body has adapted with a variety of mechanisms. Compared to dozens of hormones that are activated when our blood sugar drops too low, the body has only two mechanisms to deal blood sugar that goes too high. One is exercise—any muscular activity drives the sugar from the blood into the muscle cells where it is used as fuel. The second is the production of insulin. Insulin production is the body’s way of saying that the sugar level is too high, that the body is overfed with sugar. Insulin helps remove sugar from the blood into the cells stored as fat. (It is interesting to note that the type of fat that is made by the body under the guidance of insulin is saturated fat.)
Understanding this basic physiology leads to some interesting conclusions. One is that controlling the level of insulin produced is the key to controlling obesity. For without insulin there can be no weigh gain. People who lose the ability to make insulin (Type I diabetics) will never gain weight no matter how much food they eat unless they are supplemented with insulin. In fact, without insulin they literally starve to death.
The second conclusion we can draw is that the cause of Type II diabetes is actually quite simple. Type II diabetes occurs when for many years the consumption of foods that raise blood sugar chronically exceeds the amount of sugar needed by the muscles for exercise. This forces the body to gradually make more and more insulin in order to bring this sugar level down. Eventually, the body cannot make enough insulin to lower the sugar level, the sugar level remains chronically high and the patient is diagnosed with diabetes.
Along the way a curious thing happens called insulin resistance. This means that as the blood sugars are chronically elevated, and the insulin levels are rising, the cells build a shield or wall around themselves to slow down this influx of excess sugar. Insulin resistance is a protective or adaptive response, it is the best the body can do to protect the cells from too much glucose. But as time goes on the sugar in the blood increases, more insulin is made by the pancreas to with this elevated shutting the gates. This leads to the curious situation in which blood sugar levels are high but cellular sugar levels are low. The body perceives this as low blood sugar. The patient has low energy and feels hungry so he eats more, and the viscous cycle is under way.
Having a chronically elevated insulin level is detrimental for many other reasons. Not only do high insulin levels cause obesity (insulin tells our body to store fat), but they also signal that fluid should be retained, leading to edema and hypertension. Chronic high insulin provokes plaque development inside the arteries and also suppresses growth hormone needed for the regeneration of the tissues and many other physiological responses.
During the 1980s, researchers began to ask whether obesity, coronary artery disease, hypertension and other common medical problems that occur together are really separate diseases, or manifestations of one common physiological defect. The evidence now points to one defect and that is hyperinsulinemia, or excessive insulin levels in the blood. Hyperinsulinemia is the physiological event that links virtually all of our degenerative diseases. It is the biochemical corollary or marker of the events described in the previous chapter on heart disease.
The question we need to answer, the, is what causes hyperinsulinemia? In basic biochemistry we learn about the three basic food groups: fats, proteins, and carbohydrates. Under normal circumstances it is the carbohydrates that are transformed into the sugar that goes into the blood. Fats are broken down into fatty acids and become the building blocks for hormones, prostaglandins and cell membranes. Proteins are broken down into amino acids which then are rebuilt into the various proteins in our bodies. Carbohydrates are used for one thing only and that is energy generation. This allows us to define a “balanced” diet, which is one where the energy used in movement and exercise equals the energy provided by the carbohydrates we consume.
The problem with diabetes can be summarized by saying that the western diet has us eating like marathon runners, when in fact most of us simply sit on the couch. When we regulate the carbohydrate intake to match our exercise level, Type II diabetes cannot develop...’